- Forums
- Titanic Culture
- Titanic Movies
- Thread starterDan Kappes
- Start dateFeb 18, 2019
- Tags
- filmstitanic movies
Dan Kappes
Member
- Feb 18, 2019
- #1
The most recent film in theaters to feature a cameo of the Titanic is Holmes & Watson, but I don't know if anyone would be willing to bring a Titanic film back to the big screen after the success of James Cameron's 1997 film.
An interesting footnote: Arthur C. Clarke's 1976 novel Imperial Earth features a raised Titanic in one piece as a museum exhibit in New York City in the year 2276 and a tour guide on board says that the "most ambitious" movie about the Titanic will shortly begin filming on board the raised vessel before showing the tour guide group a screening of the 1958 film A Night to Remember.
Little did Arthur C. Clarke know that the wreck would be found in two pieces in 1985, and that James Cameron would include filmed footage of the wreck in his "ambitious" 1997 film, which turned out to be the highest-grossing film of that time.
C
Christian Pierce
Member
- Feb 18, 2019
- #2
Cameron's movie is now 22 years old, so I wouldn't be surprised if there's going to be a theatrical release some time in the next 5-8 years. 30 years without such a release would be abnormal as far as the last century is concerned. I imagine it would be compared mostly to Cameron's movie with further references to Lord's.
Steven Christian
Member
- Feb 18, 2019
- #3
I'm sure there will be another movie. It's Hollywood. Land of the re-makes.
Arun Vajpey
Member
- Feb 18, 2019
- #4
Steven Christian said:
I'm sure there will be another movie..
I hope the next one has no Jack & Jill in it....or even Rose for that matter. I'd like to see a really good semi-documentary film about the Titanic made with minimal artist's licence and sticking as close to the facts as possible. The facts themselves are more than interesting enough without the need for cheap embellishments.
If it was to be made in the next 5 years, my choice of director would be Paul Greengrass.
Kyle Naber
Member
- Feb 18, 2019
- #5
I’d like to see another ANTR within the next ten years.
Steven Christian
Member
- Feb 18, 2019
- #6
Well I guess we will have to wait and see. Hollywood/Movie industry is going thru a transition right now. Netflix, Hulu, Amazon...ect are producing their own movies that go to their streaming sites and never show up at theaters. I've been surprised at how many of the bigger stars have jumped ship and gone that route lately. I guess they see the hand writing on the wall.
Dan Kappes
Member
- Feb 19, 2019
- #7
At least after the 97 film, there were some great TV dramas about the Titanic like Blood & Steel and the 2012 one written by Julian Fellowes. (Fellowes also wrote Downton Abbey, the first episode of which mentions the Titanic)
But there have been over 20 cinema films and TV shows/episodes about the Titanic throughout the 20th century, so we'll see if we reach that number or go even higher in the future!
By the way, Paul Greengrass included a reference to ANTR in United 93, when the passengers on a doomed transportation vessel say prayers right before the end.
Cam Houseman
Member
- Sep 27, 2020
- #8
Dan Kappes said:
The most recent film in theaters to feature a cameo of the Titanic is Holmes & Watson, but I don't know if anyone would be willing to bring a Titanic film back to the big screen after the success of James Cameron's 1997 film.
An interesting footnote: Arthur C. Clarke's 1976 novel Imperial Earth features a raised Titanic in one piece as a museum exhibit in New York City in the year 2276 and a tour guide on board says that the "most ambitious" movie about the Titanic will shortly begin filming on board the raised vessel before showing the tour guide group a screening of the 1958 film A Night to Remember.
Little did Arthur C. Clarke know that the wreck would be found in two pieces in 1985, and that James Cameron would include filmed footage of the wreck in his "ambitious" 1997 film, which turned out to be the highest-grossing film of that time.
If one of us has billions of dollars, sure. James Cameron was someone who cared about the facts. Out of all of the movies, ANTR and Titanic 1997 stand out.
Arun Vajpey
Member
- Sep 28, 2020
- #9
Cam Houseman said:
James Cameron was someone who cared about the facts
I beg to disagree, Cam. Weaving a mushy romantic story into the Titanic disaster does not feel very factual to me. Also, the way Murdoch's character was portrayed. There are several other issues as well.
ANTR also introduced several non-existent events like the ship's inaugural ceremony, Captain Lord in his pajamas etc. It also was also technically very poor even for 1958 with bargain basement special effects. BUT, for all that, ANTR retained the central ethos of the disaster, unlike Cameron's film.
Kyle Naber
Member
- Sep 28, 2020
- #10
In my opinion, he went to great lengths to make the set design, sinking, costumes etc as accurate as possible. He could have chosen to not contact historians and do research like we see in many other attempts.
Arun Vajpey
Member
- Sep 28, 2020
- #11
That might be so, but the film was more about 'Jack' and 'Rose' and it so happened that they were on the Titanic. Not bad as far as a romantic film goes but if that was meant to be a film primarily about the Titanic disaster, then I am the Queen of Sheba.
Researching the period to make appearances accurate is something a lot of directors do and IMO is no excuse for converting a historical disaster into a mushy romance. The scene where the 'spirits' of Jack and Rose embrace with rest of the 'spirits' surrounding them and applauding is enough to make any intelligent person puke.
Bob Read
Member
- Sep 28, 2020
- #12
How would one make an entirely "historical" movie about Titanic? Almost every historical question regarding that night is the subject of intense debate here. If I were a director, I would play it like Cameron. I wouldn't let a historian within a mile of the set unless it had to do with set decoration. Movies are for the purpose of making money. Historical treatments are for the latest sensationalist book or YouTube video.
Cam Houseman
Member
- Sep 28, 2020
- #13
Arun Vajpey said:
I beg to disagree, Cam. Weaving a mushy romantic story into the Titanic disaster does not feel very factual to me. Also, the way Murdoch's character was portrayed. There are several other issues as well.
ANTR also introduced several non-existent events like the ship's inaugural ceremony, Captain Lord in his pajamas etc. It also was also technically very poor even for 1958 with bargain basement special effects. BUT, for all that, ANTR retained the central ethos of the disaster, unlike Cameron's film.
Without the love story, Titanic would have just been another documentary, to the mainstream audience. It would have not have sold as well. And, they made the movie based on what they knew at the time, I doubt they think Murdoch killed himself, today.
As for the Ending scene, that was purely for the love story. I don't think it was enough to make me puke. The whole story was enough to make my mom cry when she saw it in '97. I think that was just for the "Jack and Rose" story, and again, for mainstream audiences.
Arun Vajpey
Member
- Sep 28, 2020
- #14
Bob_Read said:
How would one make an entirely "historical" movie about Titanic?
Like the did the original ANTR. Despite the errors and poor special effects, it had its heart in the right place. It was a semi-documentary with no specific hero or heroine although some characters received more screen time than others.
Cam Houseman said:
Without the love story, Titanic would have just been another documentary, to the mainstream audience. It would have not have sold as well.
Unfortunately true but that does not mean that everyone should like the end-product. If Cameron or any other modern direct chose to, they could certainly make a very good semi-documentary film about the Titanic using real characters and events as far as they are best known. A simple foreword at the start of the film that the filmmakers have done their best to remain with known facts but accept that there might be small differences with actual events would have sufficed.
Such a film might not have met with box-office success like Cameron's film but would have pleased those for whom the Titanic has a special place.
The point is that very few real life events are centered around the cloying "Boy meets Girl" theme.
Cam Houseman
Member
- Sep 28, 2020
- #15
Arun Vajpey said:
A simple foreword at the start of the film that the filmmakers have done their best to remain with known facts but accept that there might be small differences with actual events would have sufficed.
Such a film might not have met with box-office success like Cameron's film but would have pleased those for whom the Titanic has a special place.
The point is that very few real life events are centered around the cloying "Boy meets Girl" theme.
But at that point, would it still be a big Titanic movie? There's 14,000 of us on the website. Could the movie survive if all of us went to go watch it?
Similar threads
NewsThe First Titanic Movie Released 85 Years Before Cameron's (But It's Lost)
- Jason D. Tiller
- Apr 24, 2022
- Titanic News
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 399
Apr 25, 2022
Vanessa Nell Ruiz
S
Will there ever be another big budget Titanic film
- Scott Newman
- Mar 7, 2005
- What We'd Like to See
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 4K
Nov 18, 2015
Jack Dawson
J
- Forums
- Titanic Culture
- Titanic Movies